I have already written about Amalie Schoenthal Wolfe, the sister of my great-grandfather Isidore Schoenthal. Amalie was born in Sielen, Germany, in 1847, and came to the US as a young woman in 1867. In 1872 she married Elias Wolfe, and together they had six children, including her daughter Etta Wolfe Wise, who was born in Pittsburgh in 1883.
A few weeks ago I heard from Alan, one of Etta’s descendants, and he shared with me numerous photographs of the family, including two that were labeled in part “Etta’s mother.” I was excited to see photographs of Amalie.
Alan said this one was labeled as Etta’s mother Amalie on the right:
And that this one labeled Etta’s mother Amalie as the woman on the left:
I can see that the two older women in these two photos are the same person—do you agree? The shape of their chins and their cheekbones are the most obvious similarities.
This is Amalie’s daughter Etta Wolfe Wise, my grandmother Eva Schoenthal’s first cousin. It might have been taken on her wedding day, June 2, 1910:
And this is her husband, Max Wise, perhaps taken around the same time:
Knowing what Etta looked like made it easy to identify her in other photos, such as this one. That looks like Etta standing in the rear to our right.
I think that the older woman standing next to Etta is the same woman as the older woman in the first two photos above and so presumably Amalie.
And I think Amalie is also the woman sitting between Etta and Max Wise in the next photo, Max sitting highest on the chair fourth from the left, then Amalie to his right, and then Etta to Amalie’s right.
Here are closeups of the four faces of the older woman cropped from those photographs:
What do you think? Are these all the same woman?
That left me puzzled about the people in the other photos of Amalie. For example, in this one, is that Etta standing next to her? At first glance I thought so, but then I wasn’t sure. Etta has such distinctive deep-set eyes, and the eyes of the woman in this photo looked different.
Here are some closeups of Etta from the known photos and from this one:
The more I look, the more I think it is Etta. And is this Etta in the more recent photo showing Amalie on the far left?
I think so, although the glasses and her squint make is hard to be sure. She certainly looks like the woman in the last of the cropped photos above.
So…what do you think? Is that Amalie in all those photos? Have I correctly identified Etta in the photos?
If so, then I need to figure out who the other people are in those photographs. To be continued…
very cool the way you cropped the photos so we could follow the who was who
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks—I had to do it for me also!
LikeLike
Amalie died in 1924. Since she is in the photo with the lady with the glasses, this should help date the photo. How old would Etta have been if this is her with the glasses?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good question—Etta was born in 1883, so she was 41 when her mother died in 1924. Amalie was 78 when she died. If those are Amalie’ss granddaughters, Florence was only 13 when Amalie died, and I think the standing girl looks older, don’t you? Flora’s daughters would have been 21 and 16 in 1924 when Amalie died. Lee’s daughter Ruth would have been 19 in 1924. Does that help to narrow down the options? What do you think? Thanks, Cathy—that is helpful!
LikeLike
I think the woman on the right with the glasses looks older than 41. Or could it be that her hair being so much lighter (pre-mature gray?) than Etta’s in the other photos makes her look older?
In the close-ups of Etta, in the first three, she has a wider nose between her eyes compared to the fourth one and the one below of the lady with the glasses. Not so sure all of them are of Etta.
LikeLiked by 1 person
OK, thanks for your thoughts. I have my doubts also. But I cannot figure out who else she might be, given that she was Amalie’s only surviving daughter and the photos were in the possession of Etta’s grandson.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s hard when you first get the photos and try to work with them. When I did my series on those old photographs several years ago, I noticed things only after about the dozenth time of looking them over! A timeline is definitely helpful along with dating the clothes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep. I should have asked Alan to hire Ava Cohn, but wasn’t sure he’s want to spend the money, and my budget for it is exhausted at the moment. So I have to settle for my amateur eyes and the help I get from my readers!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought of Ava Cohn when looking at them. Trying to ask the questions she would ask.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I tried to channel Ava also. But I don’t have her skills and knowledge. For example, I don’t know how to date clothing as specifically as she can. And she noticed the smallest physical details that elude me. But for now at least, I have to work with what I’ve got.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My analysis of the granddaughters is actually in a later post, but your thoughts would be appreciated!
LikeLike
I’ll wait to comment on the granddaughters in your later post. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds good. I need to go back and revise it. Your question raised some good doubts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is there such a thing as good doubts? 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely! If we’re not open to doubt, we make far too many mistakes!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Similarities are often deceiving. People that appear the same could be relatives. If some facial features are alike one needs to examine their clothes or jewelry they wear. Perhaps such tell-tales will help solve the identification problem, Amy.
By the way, after reading the sample of the Sante Fe Love Song I downloaded the full version on my Kindle reader. A very enjoyable piece of writing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Peter! I hope you enjoy the rest of it.
Are you seeing anything in these photos in terms of clothings or jewelry that help with identifying the women in the photo?
LikeLiked by 1 person
The necklace in the first picture is a good example. It shows again in another large photo below, indicating that we are looking at the same person.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, I missed that. I need to go back and look. Thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t see it again. That’s Etta wearing the necklace (I think), and I don’t see the same necklace in the other photos of her. Perhaps you are seeing the cropped close-up of the same photo?
LikeLike
I do think your analysis is correct.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Late to the id party 🙂 I read through all the conversation with Cathy and Peter too (good necklace clue) I do think all 4 cropped photos of the older woman are Amalie. The comparison of the woman squinting and glasses I am not sure it is the same person….. This is a tough one. Also received my copy of Santa Fe and am enjoying it. I love the photo illustrations by the grands – they are wonderful.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Sharon. I agree that that one is a tough one. And thanks for reading my book! My grandsons are so excited to be published artists!
LikeLike
Pingback: Amalie Schoenthal Wolfe and Etta Wolfe Wise: Photo Analysis Part II | Brotmanblog: A Family Journey
Absolutely spectacular photos! I don’t know it’s so hard to identify people in old photos. But in the first set for comparison why does she have a widows peak and some in a straight hairline in one of them?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Which one? Etta or Amalie? I will take another look. Thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amalie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Etta was a striking woman! I’m terrible at comparing photos so I’ll steer clear of that. Yesterday I found a photo album of my mother-in-law’s filled mostly with young people’s photos. We saw a photo of an older man and assumed it was a teacher. As my husband started to “unglue” the photo I told him to not touch it. Boy am I glad he didn’t listen to me because it not only was labeled on the back but the name was that of his great grandfather. Score!
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s great! But yeah—pulling off the photo was risky! But it sounds like it was a good risk.
LikeLike